be, we are increasingly sought by clients that are prompted by the welfare agency to pay for their parents living. Parents are always dependent for their children. Some children like to do this, it does not then naturally to such a dispute. But often these relationships are very turbid. The Supreme Court once again explained to (Az XII ZR 148/09) that a disruption of family relationships within the meaning of § 1611 BGB generally not sufficient to establish undue hardship as defined in Book XII. The forfeiture for serious misconduct put forward rather the fault of the creditor, it is not enough if he had acted intentionally in a natural sense.
0 comments:
Post a Comment